The Ohio Health Issues Poll (OHIP) is conducted every year to learn more about the health opinions, behaviors and status of adults in Ohio. In 2017, OHIP asked Ohio adults several questions about their knowledge and opinions of needle exchange programs.
Needle exchange programs, also known as syringe exchange programs or blood-borne pathogen prevention programs, are an effective way to reduce the risk of an outbreak of infectious diseases. A needle exchange program allows people who inject drugs to exchange used syringes for new, sterile syringes. Research has shown that such programs can help reduce the spread of HIV and Hepatitis C1 and do not increase the frequency or initiation of drug use.2
OHIP asked, “How familiar are you with needle exchange programs which have been implemented in a number of cities across the state of Ohio?” Four in 10 Ohio adults (40%) reported being somewhat or very familiar with these programs.
Responses to this question varied by income. Adults earning more than 138% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG)3 (46%) were more than twice as likely as those earning 138% FPG or less (21%) to be somewhat or very familiar with needle exchange programs.
OHIP asked Ohio adults if they favored or opposed needle exchange programs.4 Half of Ohio adults (50%) said they favor and about 4 in 10 Ohio adults (42%) said they oppose needle exchange programs.5 Just less than 1 in 10 (8%) are unsure.
Ohio adults who are familiar with needle exchange programs are more likely to favor them. Six in 10 Ohio adults who are very or somewhat familiar with needle exchange programs favor them (61%). This compares with 4 in 10 adults (43%) who are not very or not at all familiar with needle exchange programs. Younger adults and those who identify as Democrats are also more likely to favor these programs.
Research has found that needle exchange programs are an effective way to reduce the risk of infectious diseases among injection drug users without increasing drug use. Asking these questions helps us understand how widely information about such programs has spread through the general public in Ohio. The fact that adults more familiar with needle exchange programs are more likely to favor them may indicate that increased public education could be helpful when this tool is used to address the harms of drug use.
1 Des Jarlais, D.C., Nugent, A., Solberg, A., Feelemyer, J., Mermin, J., & Holtzman, D. (2015). Syringe service programs for persons who inject drugs in urban, suburban, and rural areas – United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64 (48), 1337-1341. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2nIK9t3.
2 Institute of Medicine. Preventing HIV infection among injecting drug users in high-risk countries: An assessment of the evidence. (2006). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2kexBqK.
3 In 2016, 138% FPG for a family of four was $33,534.
4 OHIP asked, “Some people favor needle exchange programs because they feel these programs help reduce the spread of AIDS. Others oppose needle exchange programs because they feel these programs send the message that it’s okay to use illegal drugs. What about you … Do you favor or oppose needle exchange programs?”
5 This includes strongly favor, somewhat favor and lean toward favoring, or strongly oppose, somewhat oppose and lean toward opposing.
Interact for Health regularly conducts research and collects data in order to monitor and evaluate our region’s health status and to measure public opinions about health policy.
Our Health in Action stories highlight the innovative work our grantees are doing to help reduce tobacco use, address the opioid epidemic and ensure that children can access health care through school-based health centers. We also interview people working on those issues at other organizations across the country to learn what works for them.
The Greater Cincinnati Health Watch is a free biweekly e-mail newsletter published by Interact for Health
Dec 20, 2019
Dec 30, 2019
Jan 10, 2020
Jan 14, 2020
Jan 24, 2020